Ukraine War Update: Zelensky Calls Putin ‘Dumbass’ Over Oreshnik Missile Threats calling him ‘dumbass’ In a press conference on December 19, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky fiercely responded to Russian President Vladimir Putin’s recent threats involving the Oreshnik hypersonic missile. Putin had suggested a “high-tech duel” with the West, proposing to launch the missile at Kyiv to test the capabilities of Western air defense systems. Zelensky didn’t mince words, calling Putin a “dumbass” and condemning the comments as reckless and dangerous.
Putin’s ‘High-Tech Duel’ Threat
During his annual press conference, Putin presented his idea of a “high-tech duel” where Russia would fire the Oreshnik missile at Kyiv and challenge Western air defense systems to intercept it. The missile, which Russia claims is invincible, was pitched as an “experiment” to demonstrate Russia’s technological superiority.
Zelensky responded with sharp criticism, calling Putin “a person who is living in his own fantasy world.” He also dismissed Putin’s proposal, posting a video clip of the suggestion with the comment, “People are dying, and he thinks it’s ‘interesting.’ Dumbass.”
Putin’s Previous Threats and Propaganda
Putin’s comments came after his previous threats to use the Oreshnik missile against Kyiv and other critical “decision-making centers” in Ukraine. This missile launch, accompanied by state-controlled Russian media, was intended to send a powerful message to both Ukraine and the West about Russia’s growing military capabilities.
Russia first used the Oreshnik missile in Dnipro on November 21, launching it as part of a broader effort to undermine Western support for Ukraine. The missile strike was presented as a response to the U.S. and U.K.’s decision to relax restrictions on Ukraine’s ability to launch long-range strikes within Russia.
Zelensky’s Criticism of Putin’s Peace Proposal
In addition to addressing Putin’s threats, Zelensky also reflected on earlier peace negotiations, specifically the 2022 Istanbul talks, where Putin proposed a ceasefire in exchange for territorial concessions. Zelensky described the peace talks as a sham, explaining that Russia had essentially demanded Ukraine surrender its independence, abandon aspirations for NATO membership, and shift allegiance to Moscow.
“Putin offered Ukraine to surrender, freeze the conflict, and give up our independence. These aren’t agreements; they are demands for capitulation,” Zelensky commented. He further labeled Putin as an “old fantasist living in his own aquarium.”
Zelensky’s Call for Coordinated International Effort
During his December 19 address, Zelensky also warned against falling for Russia’s tactics of seeking temporary ceasefires as a way to regroup. Zelensky emphasized the importance of coordinated international support to secure a lasting peace, rather than a ceasefire that would only serve to buy time for Russia. He stressed that such a truce would not lead to an end to the war and would leave the conflict “frozen” and unresolved.
Zelensky urged European and American leaders to take a united stance on ending the war with clear conditions for peace, including full support for Ukraine’s territorial integrity. He also noted the role of nations in the Global South like China, India, Brazil, and Saudi Arabia in pushing for respect for territorial sovereignty.
Trump’s Potential Influence on Peace Negotiations
Ahead of U.S. President-elect Donald Trump’s anticipated focus on resolving the war after his inauguration, Zelensky expressed concern about any potential pressure for Ukraine to cede territory or give up NATO ambitions. Trump has suggested he could end the conflict in a matter of hours, but Zelensky made it clear that any peace deal must prioritize Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity.
Zelensky urged Europe to ensure that any peace initiative would be coordinated to prevent Moscow from exploiting divisions.
Ukraine Strikes Key Russian Oil Refinery
In a related military development, Ukraine’s Navy and the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) carried out a coordinated strike on the Novoshakhtinsk oil refinery in Russia’s Rostov Oblast on December 19. This refinery, located near the Ukrainian border, is the only operational oil refinery in the region, producing up to 7.5 million tons of oil products annually.
The attack caused significant damage, leading to fires and disruptions at the facility. Ukrainian officials revealed that the strike was part of a broader strategy to target Russia’s oil infrastructure, a key source of revenue for its war efforts.
Putin Acknowledges Sanctions Impact on Russia’s Economy
Russian President Vladimir Putin admitted on December 19 during his annual press conference that international sanctions are having an impact on Russia’s economy, particularly in driving up prices. However, he suggested that the sanctions were not the primary cause of Russia’s economic challenges, attributing the surging inflation to issues such as supply shortages and rising global prices. Despite this acknowledgment, Russian officials had previously downplayed the significance of Western sanctions imposed in response to the invasion of Ukraine, often claiming that the economy remained resilient.
Putin noted that Russia’s annual inflation rate had increased to around 9.2-9.3%, with the ruble hovering near 100 to the U.S. dollar. To combat this, the central bank raised interest rates to 21%, the highest level since the early 2000s. While Putin argued that inflation was primarily driven by supply-demand imbalances and global price hikes, many experts have linked the inflationary pressure to Russia’s heavy military spending, particularly its ongoing war in Ukraine.
Despite the central bank’s efforts, including raising interest rates, some experts believe that more effective measures could have been implemented earlier. The combined effect of sanctions and inflation is beginning to impact several sectors of the Russian economy, including automotive, aviation, and retail. These economic challenges come amid increased international pressure and growing calls from U.S. President-elect Donald Trump to initiate peace talks with Ukraine, although Moscow has shown little interest in negotiations.
Ukraine Special Forces Report Killing 12 North Korean Soldiers in Kursk Oblast
On December 19, Ukraine’s Special Operations Forces reported a successful operation in Kursk Oblast, where they killed 12 North Korean soldiers and injured 20 others, halting their advance. Since August, Russia has reportedly deployed over 10,000 North Korean troops to support its efforts in ousting Ukrainian forces in the region.
Using drones and an Mk-19 grenade launcher, Ukraine’s Special Forces repelled the North Korean soldiers’ attempt to advance, according to official statements and videos released by the Ukrainian military. Previously, Ukraine’s military intelligence had confirmed the deaths or injuries of 30 North Korean soldiers in ground assaults between December 14 and 15.
This brings the total number of North Korean casualties to at least 100, according to reports from South Korean officials. While these claims have yet to be independently verified, the involvement of North Korean soldiers in Russia’s ground operations has been confirmed by multiple sources, including the Pentagon, which acknowledged their participation in combat operations in Kursk Oblast.
President Volodymyr Zelensky has accused Russia of trying to downplay the extent of losses among North Korean troops, a tactic used to maintain morale and limit international scrutiny.
Putin’s Oreshnik Threats and the ‘High-Tech Duel’
In a recent press conference, Putin boasted about the capabilities of Russia’s new Oreshnik hypersonic missile and suggested that a “high-tech duel” could determine the outcome of the war. He proposed that both sides focus their defenses on Kyiv and then see how the Oreshnik missile performs against them. This bold statement was intended to demonstrate Russia’s technological superiority in warfare.
Putin’s comments raised alarm globally, especially in Ukraine, where civilians have already suffered from years of brutal Russian military tactics. However, Zelensky’s response was swift and candid, calling Putin’s threats “interesting” but ultimately dismissing them as foolish. Zelensky’s retort further illustrated the stark contrast between the two leaders’ approaches to the ongoing war.
Zelensky’s Response: A Bold Rejection of Putin’s Provocation
Zelensky’s direct call of Putin a “dumbass” captured global attention, especially for its bluntness in the face of such a serious threat. In his usual style, Zelensky used this remark to underscore Ukraine’s defiance and refusal to back down in the face of intimidation.
- Ukraine’s Resilience: Zelensky’s response wasn’t just a personal insult—it was a powerful message of resilience. His strong reaction reassured Ukrainians and the international community that Ukraine would not be swayed by Russia’s provocative rhetoric or threats.
- Leadership Contrast: While Putin’s remarks were designed to highlight Russia’s military power, Zelensky’s response emphasized his leadership in a nation that has faced continuous military assault but remains undeterred.
Putin’s Hypersonic Oreshnik: A New Military Threat
The Oreshnik missile, a new development in Russia’s arsenal, is capable of traveling at speeds exceeding Mach 5, making it nearly impossible for current air defense systems to intercept. Putin has presented the missile as a symbol of Russia’s military advancements and its ability to confront the West.
While Putin has touted the missile’s potential, Ukraine has already dealt with various forms of advanced Russian weaponry, including cruise missiles, drones, and artillery attacks. The latest threat with Oreshnik is seen as another escalation in Russia’s efforts to regain momentum in the war, which has increasingly turned against it.
Zelensky’s Public Rejection of Putin’s Military Posturing
Zelensky’s response to Putin’s missile threat wasn’t just personal—it also had significant diplomatic implications.
- Global Messaging: Zelensky’s remarks serve as a message to the world: Ukraine is not intimidated by Russian threats, and its commitment to sovereignty and independence remains unwavering.
- Boosting Morale: Domestically, Zelensky’s direct challenge to Putin boosts national morale. As the war drags on, Ukraine continues to rely on the strength of its leadership to maintain both civilian and military resolve in the face of adversity.
The Broader Impact: What This Means for the Ukraine-Russia Conflict
Zelensky’s reaction underscores a growing global sentiment that the war in Ukraine is not just about territorial disputes; it is about defending democratic values against authoritarian aggression. As Putin continues to make bold, often provocative statements, Zelensky’s counterattacks have positioned Ukraine as the moral high ground in the conflict.
- International Support: Zelensky’s leadership continues to garner substantial international support, especially from Western nations. His ability to confront Putin with bold, strategic language strengthens Ukraine’s diplomatic position.
- Tactical Resilience: On the battlefield, Ukraine remains resilient despite Russia’s technological advances. Zelensky’s rejection of Russia’s missile threats serves to reassure the world that Ukraine is not willing to concede or be intimidated by Russia’s military tactics.
May you also like it:
Putin Says Russia is Ready to Compromise with Trump on Ukraine War
Russian Missile Strike on Kyiv Damages Western Embassy
Ukraine Reports Russian Missile Attack Kills One, Damages Embassies
FAQs
Why did Zelensky call Putin a “dumbass”?
Zelensky used this direct insult to reject Putin’s provocative missile threat and to demonstrate Ukraine’s determination not to be intimidated.
What is the Oreshnik missile?
Oreshnik is a hypersonic missile developed by Russia, capable of traveling at speeds over Mach 5, making it difficult for defense systems to intercept.
How does Zelensky’s response affect Ukraine’s morale?
Zelensky’s strong reaction boosts the morale of Ukrainians, reinforcing their resolve to resist Russia’s aggression.
What did Putin propose in his “high-tech duel” idea?
Putin suggested a technological contest, in which Russia would strike Kyiv with Oreshnik while Ukraine would defend with its missile systems, to demonstrate Russia’s technological superiority.
How does Zelensky’s leadership contrast with Putin’s?
While Putin relies on military threats and posturing, Zelensky emphasizes resilience, leadership, and defiance against aggression, making him a symbol of Ukraine’s fight for independence.
What impact does this have on international relations?
Zelensky’s bold rejection of Putin’s threats further solidifies Ukraine’s position on the global stage, strengthening its alliances with Western nations.
Conclusion
Zelensky’s swift and direct response to Putin’s Oreshnik missile threats highlights not only his leadership but also Ukraine’s enduring resolve in the Ukraine-Russia war. While Russia continues to escalate its military tactics, Zelensky’s strong stance serves as a powerful reminder that Ukraine is committed to defending its sovereignty—no matter the cost. As the conflict continues, Zelensky’s leadership remains central to both Ukraine’s morale and its international diplomatic efforts.